What We Hear From Law Firms
Client matters cannot go into tools that train on your inputs. Most free AI tools do exactly that by default. Knowing which settings and which vendors are safe is the whole game.
Surveys keep finding lawyers using AI without firm approval. Without a policy, every associate is making their own judgment call about privilege and confidentiality.
Courts have sanctioned lawyers for fabricated citations. The fix is workflow design: AI drafts, humans verify, and certain outputs always get cite-checked before filing.
What We Set Up For You
We review vendor terms, training-data policies, and retention settings, and give your firm an approved tool list with the right configurations.
A written policy aligned with ABA Formal Opinion 512 and your state bar guidance, plus live training for attorneys and staff on what is safe per matter type.
AI-assisted first drafts, document summarization, and client intake triage, designed so a lawyer reviews everything before it leaves the firm.
For the most sensitive practices we deploy local models where client data never leaves machines you control.
Built Around ABA Formal Opinion 512
The ABA has been clear: lawyers can use generative AI, but competence, confidentiality, and supervision duties still apply. Our audit inventories what your firm uses today, closes the risky gaps, and documents the policy so you can answer client and malpractice-carrier questions with a straight face.